ABOUT
THIS BLOG
Polybios (Greek Πολυβιος) (about
203- 120 BC) was
a Greek historian describing Rome and its rise, but also warning against
tendencies leading to the degeneration of the republic into the anarchy of its
last century.
The aim of this blog is to warn against
tendencies in the present global developments, tendencies within power balance,
politics, culture, the media and other areas. These tendencies will undermine political
stability and pluralism in the broadest sense, nationally and internationally.
There will be use of historical parallels, especially on the large scale from
an assumption of parallel development of the high cultures or civilizations.
This view is inspired by authors like Spengler and Toynbee. Such views are old
and in this
blog I do not intend to add much to their theories.
Rather I will try to apply the ideas to understand the present.
For Spengler the development of every
civilization is bound and predictable, for Toynbee not. I agree with Toynbee,
but only under certain circumstances. Only if we learn and deliberately act to
influence development can we avoid the destiny of the former civilizations.
This destiny is a continuance of national and international conflicts,
degenerating politics and a pluralism, which continues but comes under threat.
These developments will continue for about 100 years or less, and then end with the uniting of the world under one (or perhaps two) cesarean
dictators. This means peace, but also the death of this pluralism and of
course of democracy.
It is these developments, we must act to
counter.
It should be noted that history does not
repeat itself in details. On a large scale the civilizations till now have gone through the same overall developments of the same durations, but of course at a different
time for every single civilization. One can cautiously set up a time frame
by putting a time displacement for each civilization, a number saying how many
years before our own, this civilization went through the same stages as we do.
The Greco-roman civilization is about 2100 years before us. The first Chinese
civilization about 2300 years before us, old Egypt about 3600 years, the Arab or oriental culture about 1000 years etc. So the Greek and Romans were at our stage
around 100 BC, the Chinese around 300 BC and again around 1200 AD, the Arabs
around 1000 AD.
But the details in the development of
these civilizations differ very much. It is as if the concept civilization as
such is like the psychological concept of a prototype (Rosch). It is a sort of
mean of the 13 or so
single civilizations. These can be as individual as
single species of birds are individual
examples of the prototype bird. Ostriches and sparrows are both
birds, but look very
different. The same is the case for civilizations.
As said,
I do not think that a repetition of the fate of earlier civilizations is
unavoidable. One might think that globalization and information technology
could result in an entirely new era after the era of the rising and falling
civilizations, which has lasted about 5500 years (as assumed by for example the theory
of the technological
singularity).
But a look at the present developments and the comparison with for example the Romans inspires pessimism.
The world seems to be sliding without reflection and consciousness toward the
same end as in the 12 cases before us. Just on a crazily higher technological
level.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.